[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[infowar.de] Cyber-Security Plan der US-Regierung unter Druck
Administration Pares Cyber-Security Plan
Firms Fight Some Recommendations
By Ariana Eunjung Cha
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, September 10, 2002; Page A04
As the White House moves to finalize a national plan to better secure cybe=
high-tech firms and other companies are continuing a furious campaign to h=
some recommendations struck from the document.
The administration no longer plans to recommend that Internet service prov=
such as America Online, MSN and EarthLink bundle firewall and other securi=
technology with their software. Instead, it will ask ISPs to "make it easi=
er" for home
users to get access to such protections.
It also does not plan to recommend that a privacy czar be appointed to ove=
companies make use of their customers' personal information, according to =
people involved in drafting the document.
A government official said the changes were made in hopes the plan would b=
adopted voluntarily by industry and not necessitate another layer of gover=
Several companies have argued that if the government tells people what to =
dictates how they should run their businesses, innovation will be squelche=
others said private industry was more concerned about the costs involved i=
out the recommendations. Businesses also worry about taking on new legal l=
"I've been really shocked at how companies have been acting in their own i=
rather than in the national interest," said Allan Paller, director of the =
SANS Institute, a
computer-security think tank and education center.
Harris Miller, president of the Information Technology Association of Amer=
represents 500 companies, said the private sector is in no way trying to d=
plan. It was the industry, in fact, that first suggested a plan be develop=
ed, he said.
"The idea that industry is somehow a reluctant partner is inaccurate," Mil=
At about 150 pages, the National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace, which is s=
to be released Sept. 18, remains a weighty document outlining about 80 new=
obligations for the government, companies, universities and even home comp=
The most extensive recommendations are for the government. The plan would
restrict federal workers from using certain wireless technologies and mand=
agencies only purchase software that has been certified to be secure.
One of the top priorities, according to one draft, is for the government a=
nd the private
sector is to make sure computers that control major systems such as subway=
nuclear reactors and dams are secure.
Also under consideration are recommendations calling for the establishment=
center that would study computer viruses, worms and other security threats=
accreditation board that would certify security personnel; and a private-p=
program that would help pay for security enhancements for critical parts o=
Internet, including the routers that direct traffic, as well as operating =
systems such as
Windows, Linux and the Mac OS.
Some drafts also outline plans for the collection and analysis of network =
pass through universities -- places often used as jumping-off points for c=
The draft also includes a plan to educate home users on how to secure thei=
The national strategy is being compiled and analyzed by Richard A. Clarke,=
of the Office of Cyberspace Security, with input from a cross section of i=
representatives, computer science experts and others.
It is scheduled to be delivered to President Bush for his signature in the=
=A9 2002 The Washington Post Company
Mail an infowar -
- infopeace -
de mit "unsubscribe" im Text.