Suche innerhalb des Archivs / Search the Archive All words Any words

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[] Daily Times 26.02.03 (R.Fisk): News reports to be censored to accommodate Pentagon,

News reports to be censored to accommodate Pentagon

By Robert Fisk

A new CNN system of 'script approval' suggests the Pentagon will have 
nothing to worry about

Already, the American press is expressing its approval of the coverage of 
American forces that the US military intends to allow its reporters in the 
next Gulf war. The boys from CNN, CBS, ABC and The New York Times will be 
"embedded" among the US marines and infantry. The degree of censorship 
hasn't quite been worked out. But it doesn't matter how much the Pentagon 
cuts from the reporters' dispatches. A new CNN system of "script approval" 
the iniquitous instruction to reporters that they have to send all their 
copy to anonymous officials in Atlanta to ensure it is suitably sanitised 
suggests that the Pentagon and the Department of State have nothing to 
worry about. Nor do the Israelis.

Indeed, reading a new CNN document, "Reminder of Script Approval Policy", 
fairly takes the breath away. "All reporters preparing package scripts must 
submit the scripts for approval," it says. "Packages may not be edited 
until the scripts are approved... All packages originating outside 
Washington, LA (Los Angeles) or NY (New York), including all international 
bureaus, must come to the ROW in Atlanta for approval."

The date of this extraordinary message is 27 January. The "ROW" is the row 
of script editors in Atlanta who can insist on changes or "balances" in the 
reporter's dispatch. "A script is not approved for air unless it is 
properly marked approved by an authorised manager and duped (duplicated) to 
burcopy (bureau copy)... When a script is updated it must be re-approved, 
preferably by the originating approving authority."

Note the key words here: "approved" and "authorised". CNN's man or woman in 
Kuwait or Baghdad or Jerusalem or Ramallah may know the background to his 
or her story; indeed, they will know far more about it than the 
"authorities" in Atlanta. But CNN's chiefs will decide the spin of the story.

CNN, of course, is not alone in this paranoid form of reporting. Other US 
networks operate equally anti-journalistic systems. And it's not the fault 
of the reporters. CNN's teams may use clichés and don military costumes you 
will see them do this in the next war but they try to get something of the 
truth out. Next time, though, they're going to have even less chance.

Just where this awful system leads is evident from an intriguing exchange 
last year between CNN's reporter in the occupied West Bank town of 
Ramallah, and Eason Jordan, one of CNN's top honchos in Atlanta.

The journalist's first complaint was about a story by the reporter Michael 
Holmes on the Red Crescent ambulance drivers who are repeatedly shot at by 
Israeli troops. "We risked our lives and went out with ambulance drivers... 
for a whole day. We have also witnessed ambulances from our window being 
shot at by Israeli soldiers... The story received approval from Mike 
Shoulder. The story ran twice and then Rick Davis (a CNN executive) killed 
it. The reason was we did not have an Israeli army response, even though we 
stated in our story that Israel believes that Palestinians are smuggling 
weapons and wanted people in the ambulances."

The Israelis refused to give CNN an interview, only a written statement. 
This statement was then written into the CNN script. But again Davis in 
Atlanta rejected it. Only when, after three days, the Israeli army gave CNN 
an interview did Holmes's story run but then with the dishonest inclusion 
of a line that said the ambulances were shot in "crossfire" (i.e. that 
Palestinians also shot at their own ambulances).

The reporter's complaint was all too obvious. "Since when do we hold a 
story hostage to the whims of governments and armies? Rick told us that if 
we do not get an Israeli on-camera we would not air the package. This means 
that governments and armies are indirectly censoring us and we are playing 
directly into their own hands."

The relevance of this is all too obvious in the next Gulf War. We are going 
to have to see a US army officer denying everything the Iraqis say if any 
report from Iraq is to get on air. Take another of the Ramallah 
correspondent's complaints last year. In a package on the damage to 
Ramallah after Israel's massive incursion last April, "we had already 
mentioned right at the top of our piece that Israel says it is doing all 
these incursions because it wants to crack down on the infrastructure of 
terror. However, obviously that was not enough. We were made by the ROW (in 
Atlanta) to repeat this same idea three times in one piece, just to make 
sure that we keep justifying the Israeli actions..."

But the system of "script approval" that has so marred CNN's coverage has 
got worse. In a further and even more sinister message dated 31 January 
this year, CNN staff are told that a new computerised system of script 
approval will allow "authorised script approvers to mark scripts (i.e. 
reports) in a clear and standard manner. Script EPs (executive producers) 
will click on the coloured approved button to turn it from red (unapproved) 
to green (approved). When someone makes a change in the script after 
approval, the button will turn yellow." Someone? Who is this someone? CNN's 
reporters aren't told.

But when we recall that CNN revealed after the 1991 Gulf War that it had 
allowed Pentagon "trainees" into the CNN newsroom in Atlanta, I have my 
suspicions. ?Independent

Liste verlassen: 
Mail an infowar -
 de-request -!
- infopeace -
 de mit "unsubscribe" im Text.