[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[infowar.de] Update: Animal and Ecological Terrorism Act
Infowar.de, http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~bendrath/liste.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
http://environment.about.com/cs/activism/a/terrorism.htm
Update: Animal and Ecological Terrorism Act
Civil Rights vs. Fear of Terrorism
Animal rights and environmental activists are the targets of a new
bill introduced into the Texas Legislature in February 2003 by
Representative Ray Allen (R-Grapevine). H.B. 433, the so-called
"Animal and Ecological Terrorism Act" is loosely modeled after federal
laws designed to combat the "war on terrorism;" however, this bill
uses fear as the tool to implement legislation seeking to criminalize
any activity pertaining to animal rights or environmental activism.
Did I mention that the model bill was drafted by the national
lobbyists group, The U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance (USSA)? The USSA, along
with the America Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC)are promoting this
bill nationwide.
A Glimpse at some of the Wording of H.B. 433:
Definition of Animal Rights or Ecological Terrorist Organization under
this bill: Two or more persons organized for the purpose of supporting
any politically motivated activity intended to obstruct or deter any
person from participating in an activity involving animals or natural
resources.
Definition of Political Motivation: any intent to influence a
governmental entity or the public to take a specific political action.
If passed in its current form, H.B. 433 would destroy Texan's civil
rights. Under the bill, anyone could be considered a "terrorist" if
they were to participate in any activity (legitimate peaceful protest,
civil disobedience, demonstration, or debate) on behalf of
environmental or animal welfare. Similarly, contributing money or
contributions in any form to these supposed "terrorist cells" would be
punishable.
The bill would also create a state-run Website similar to the
state-run sex-offender sites, wherein all offenders would be required
to register their name, address, and provide a current photo for three
years.
Furthermore, the bill language implies that a journalist could not
enter a facility (any facility that is potentially harming the
environment or animals) to photograph or record any wrongdoings for
the purpose of informing the public or defaming the facility for such
acts.
The U.S. Sportsman's Alliance has lobbied variations of this bill to
legislators in Mississippi, Washington, New York and Wisconsin for
2003 as part of a state-by-state campaign to bring down the radical
environmental and animal rights movements.
My personal opinion is that the only people this bill stands to hurt
are the activists engaging in legitimate means of protest. Several
bills trying to curb politically motivated acts of "eco-terrorism"
have been passed in Oregon and Washington; yet, the numbers for these
crimes continue to rise steadily. Frustration and fear on the part of
lawmakers and federal agents have left them with the idea that all
activists are involved in illegal activity; however, proposing laws
such as these which rob us of our basic constitutional rights is not
the answer.
Similar bills have appeared within the past few weeks in New York,
Pennsylvania, and Maine, and may soon appear in (at least) Wisconsin,
Mississippi and Washington.
~ Lara Jill Rosenblith
--
This email address is used only for mailing lists. To reply,
please use nico.j[at]web.de
NicoJ meinzeug -!
- gmx -
net
---------------------------------------------------------------
Liste verlassen:
Mail an infowar -
de-request -!
- infopeace -
de mit "unsubscribe" im Text.