[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[infowar.de] Boeing Battle Management System
Ein Bericht der L.A. Times =FCber Boeing's Battle Management
System (mit Hinweis auf ein Promo-Video).
Ushering In the Warfare Information Age
Combat: A Boeing unit is building a system to provide exhaustive
data any time, anywhere
By PETER PAE
TIMES STAFF WRITER
March 16 2002
Behind triple security doors in an obscure industrial complex, Boeing
Co. engineers at the firm's little-known but pioneering Anaheim unit
are quietly working on a system that could alter the future of warfare.
Resembling a war room that seems modeled after a "Star Wars"
movie, a 10-foot-high screen displays a satellite image of a region,
with moving squares and triangles identifying fighter jets, bombers
and spy planes. A second screen shows detailed infrared images of
a building targeted for possible attack. A third provides a live feed
from a foot soldier wearing a small video camera on his helmet.
The images were part of a mock military operation in an unidentified
Middle Eastern region but provided a rare glimpse at what Boeing
officials believe represents the methods of war for the 21st century.
What the Pentagon has in mind over the next decade represents a
huge leap over even the seemingly sophisticated battle-
management system it has used in the Afghan conflict. Under the
concept known as integrated battle space, U.S. military leaders will
have unprecedented access to information from anyplace around
the globe, tracking ships, planes, vehicles and individual soldiers
from a command and control center that could be thousands of
miles away. In essence, it would bring together disparate systems so
they can talk to one another and provide a common picture of the
Soldiers would carry hand-held computers linked to satellites that
would provide not only their own precise location but also where the
enemy might be. The command center also could transmit detailed
maps and images of enemy compounds to soldiers anywhere in the
world. Instead of radio commands, marching orders may come via
"It represents a fundamental reversal of the way wars have been
fought for the past 2 1/2 centuries," said John Pike, director of
GlobalSecurity.org, a Web-based think tank in Virginia.
"Ten years ago, Norman Schwarzkopf had to pack up a small town
and move it to Saudi Arabia to fight the Gulf War. You won't have to
do that anymore. It'll be a lot like telecommuting."
And again, engineers in Anaheim are leading the way. A former
Rockwell International Corp. operation that Boeing acquired in 1996,
the unit has been a major technology center for decades, developing
defense and aerospace systems that have reshaped aerospace
The guidance and control system for the Minuteman intercontinental
ballistic missile was developed in Anaheim, altering the course of
the Cold War. The division also developed major components of the
Apollo space program that put the first man on the moon. It did
much of the pioneering work on night vision during the 1970s.
Now, it is the development center for the nation's multibillion-dollar
missile defense program and is competing to reshape and
modernize the Coast Guard.
Last week, the unit won one of its biggest trophies, a contract to
develop combat systems for the Army that has a potential value of
at least $4 billion over the next five years. As the lead system
integrator, a Boeing team will draw up plans for a system of new
weapons and technologies that the Army hopes will turn it into a
lighter, faster and more lethal force.
The Army contract was a huge win because it validated a risky push
by Boeing officials to focus its resources and engineering talent on a
business that seemed more like a pie in the sky than a potential
At a time when most defense contractors were focusing on
developing next-generation weapons, Boeing two years ago began
looking at producing a system of systems that would integrate
disparate weapons and technologies to provide a coherent strategy
for fighting a war. A major byproduct of the move was the creation of
the Battlefield Integration Center, a $16-million, 11,000-square-foot
compound in Anaheim where much of the integrated battle space is
getting developed and tested.
The timing could not have been better. Since the Sept. 11 terrorist
attacks and the subsequent military action in Afghanistan, scores of
Pentagon officials have visited the Anaheim facility. Army officials
cited Boeing's work on integrated battle space as one of the reasons
for the company winning the contract against Lockheed Martin Corp.
and General Dynamics Corp. Unlike the competitors, Boeing has
had few Army contracts.
Quest for Battle Data
Military strategists have been after the Holy Grail of battlefield
intelligence--the ability to constantly monitor all military activities--f=
decades in hopes of lifting the so-called fog of war, but with the
recent convergence of advanced communication equipment, highly
sensitive intelligence-gathering sensors and powerful computer
chips, the dream is becoming a reality.
"Battles have been won or lost on incomplete information," said
Loren Thompson, a longtime Pentagon consultant and lecturer of
defense policy at Georgetown University. "This is one of the ways
superior information is going to dictate victory."
Some elements of the integrated battle space already are taking
shape, particularly with military operations in Afghanistan. For the
first time, the commander of U.S. forces fighting overseas is running
the operation from within the U.S. at the headquarters of the Central
Command in Tampa, Fla.
Some military leaders have said Army Gen. Tommy R. Frank should
be closer to action. Frank has defended the decision, saying he is
getting all the information he needs, thanks to the advances in high-
speed communications and information technology. The distant
command center may represent the emergence of a new way of
fighting, he said.
"We can view and we can access any battle space," Air Force Chief
of Staff Gen. John P. Jumper said at a recent defense conference.
"When air and space combine together in the right ways . . . we can
find, fix, track, target, engage and assess anything of significance on
the face of Earth."
But Jumper added, "Right now, I would argue, these are capabilities
that exists in bits and pieces. It is our job to pull it all together, to =
able to think in terms of integration."
One vivid example was displayed last fall when, for the first time,
the White House was able to watch a live video feed of an attack on
Taliban forces in Afghanistan transmitted by a flying spy drone. The
video transmission was relayed by satellite to the Florida command
center, which then sent it on to Washington.
In another mission, an Army special operations soldier was able to
call in an airstrike, communicating directly with an Air Force bomber.
Previously, the Army would have had to request a strike through
central command, which then would relay the information to Air
Force command to carry out a strike, wasting invaluable time.
Many of the top defense contractors are scrambling to tap the
growing market for integrated battle space, and all of the armed
services are developing their own concepts for the technology, also
known as network centric warfare, but Boeing engineers hope to
field a system of systems that can be used and seen across all the
So far, Lockheed Martin Corp. has been a key player in creating
such a system for the Navy, while Raytheon Corp. has been looking
to fuse many of its weapons and systems for the Air Force.
Meanwhile, Northrop Grumman Corp. is making a hostile bid for
TRW Inc. so that it can tap the company's space and defense-
electronics expertise and have the businesses it needs to field its
own version of an integrated battle space.
Defense analysts said winning the Army contract was a major boost
to Boeing's effort in what many believe is the growth business of the
Boeing officials said they began talking about bringing together
various businesses that the aerospace firm operates to provide the
integrated battle space concept in 2000. The company made it a
major business initiative as Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld
began pushing for bringing the military into the digital age.
"We've had some of Rumsfeld's people in here and this has been
music to their ears," said Roger Roberts, vice president of Boeing
Integrated Defense Systems. "We believe the vision for [an
integrated battle space] can be realized within the decade."
The work could be lucrative. Boeing believes that putting together
various elements of the integrated battle space, including work in
unmanned aerial reconnaissance aircraft and equipping an older
generation of Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS)
aircraft, already represents a market of perhaps $7 billion to $8
billion a year. That could grow to more than $20 billion in the next
decade, Boeing officials said.
"We believe this will be a major growth area for us," said James F.
Albaugh, president of Boeing's Space and Communications unit. He
noted that one key reason for acquiring the satellite-making business
of Hughes Electronics for $3.8 billion last year was to tap its
expertise in space-based communications, which will be integral to
developing the requirements for an integrated battle space.
Immediately, part of the effort could include equipping airborne
tankers--a constellation of which is constantly in the air to refuel
fighters and bombers--with antennae and electronic equipment that
allow the aircraft to relay data and communications from the
battlefield to far-flung command and control centers.
"The technology is already here," said Ret. Lt. Gen. Carl O'Berry, a
former deputy chief for command, control, communications and
computers for the Air Force and now head of Boeing's strategic
architecture unit. "We just need to integrate it."
A Boeing video demonstrating the military technology can be seen
Mail an infowar -
- infopeace -
de mit "unsubscribe" im Text.