Suche innerhalb des Archivs / Search the Archive All words Any words

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[] Homeland Security IT chief blamed for cyberwoes

Das war vor zwei Tagen. Und heute die Meldung des Mail-Hacks im Pentagon - schon komisch. (Robert Gates ist natürlich Verteidigungsminister, nicht DHS-Minister. Da hatte ich die beiden Meldungen im Kopf schon zusammengebracht in der letzten Mail.)

Homeland Security IT chief blamed for cyberwoes

By Anne Broache
Staff Writer, CNET
June 20, 2007

WASHINGTON -- In response to reports of persistent cybersecurity flaws
at the Department of Homeland Security, a top congressional Democrat on
Wednesday questioned whether the agency's chief information officer
deserves to keep his job.

The department charged with safeguarding the security of the nation's
computer systems has not been setting a good example and CIO Scott
Charbo hasn't shown he's serious about fixing its vulnerabilities, said
Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), chairman of the House of Representatives
Homeland Security Committee.

"How can we ask the private sector to better train employees and
implement more consistent access controls when DHS allows employees to
send classified e-mails over unclassified networks and contractors to
attach unapproved laptops to the network?" Thompson asked at an
afternoon hearing here held by a subcommittee that deals with
cybersecurity issues.

He was referring to the Homeland Security department's revelation, as
part of an ongoing subcommittee probe into its information security
practices, that it experienced 844 security-related "incidents" on its
computer systems in 2005 and 2006. Those episodes included unauthorized
users hooking up personal computers to government networks, unauthorized
software installations, classified e-mails traveling over unclassified
networks, suspicious botnet activity, trojans and virus infections,
classified data spillages and misconfigured firewalls.

Charbo, for his part, downplayed the lengthy list, saying that they
didn't indicate actual penetrations of the system and varied widely in
the level of severity. "Those are events that we report on as a
data-gathering tool," the IT chief told the politicians, adding that he
was confident all breaches considered significant had been addressed

The congressional panel that convened Wednesday's hearing has been
probing the extent to which various federal agencies are equipped to
handle cyberthreats. At a hearing in April, committee members accused
officials at the Commerce and State Departments of being ill-prepared to
handle such threats in light of reports of intrusions from Chinese
hackers, and they warned that Homeland Security would be undergoing
scrutiny next.

Criticism of that department's cybersecurity efforts from Congress and
federal auditors is hardly new. Some would argue the department has
shown minor signs of improvement this year since it pulled up its
federal information security "grade" from an "F" to a "D."

Even so, Government Accountability Office auditors at Wednesday's
hearing said various components of Homeland Security still aren't doing
enough to limit access to their systems, authenticate and identify
users, encrypt sensitive data and keep logs of user activity.

The GAO is preparing to release a report based on a yearlong
investigation that it says documents "pervasive" security flaws in
Homeland Security's US-VISIT program, which is designed to verify the
identity of foreigners through fingerprint scans and is currently being
used at several U.S. ports of entry.

Keith Rhodes, one of the report's authors, said the GAO found that
US-VISIT is riddled with problems "across the board," which, left
uncorrected, could put sensitive personal information at risk. The flaws
are mostly due to "bad configurations" that could be fixed both easily
and cheaply, he said. But because of the deficiencies, there's no way of
knowing whether the database associated with the computer systems has
already been hacked, he said.

"I did not see controls in place that would prevent (hacking), I did not
see defensive perimeters, and I did not see detections systems in place
that would let you know whether it had or had not" been hacked, Rhodes
told the committee.

Charbo said he and department officials were still reviewing the draft
version of that report but were prepared to address the weaknesses by
year's end.

On a broader level, Charbo said he realizes the agency has improvements
to make but urged the politicians not to overlook what he called
"significant progress" during the past few years. For instance, it has
"remediated" 7,000 weaknesses identified by auditors and has certified
that 95 percent of its systems have appropriate controls in
place--compared with only 26 percent in October 2005.

Others questioned whether the department has been dedicating enough of
its overall tech budget to security. According to Homeland Security, it
spent $12.5 million in 2004, $17.5 million in 2005, and $15 million in
2006 and 2007. Charbo justified those expenditures by saying they
reflected "our strategic security plan."

The lone Republican present at the hearing, subcommittee co-chairman
Michael McCaul (R-Texas), said he and others were considering
introducing legislation that would force Homeland Security to come up
with a "national strategic threat assessment" regarding U.S.

"This has never been done, it's long overdue, and the nation needs this
to protect it," he said, adding that he feared a devastating cyberattack
could be worse than the "effects of a weapon of mass destruction."

To unsubscribe, e-mail: infowar -
de-unsubscribe -!
- infopeace -
For additional commands, e-mail: infowar -
de-help -!
- infopeace -